+VLFBERHT+ | Healthcare

Clinical AI that
clinicians can trust.

AI-assisted diagnostics are transforming care delivery. A hallucinated drug interaction or fabricated clinical reference can harm patients. Ulfberht verifies every clinical AI output before it reaches the care team -- with documented evidence, not AI self-assessment.

Built for HIPAA environments FDA SaMD pending Designed for EU MDR HL7 FHIR compatible

Healthcare AI has a verification gap that
clinical teams cannot close manually.

Clinical AI systems generate diagnostics, medication recommendations, and treatment plans at a speed and volume no oversight process was designed to handle. The failure modes are specific, documented, and directly tied to patient outcomes.

Risk 01

Diagnostic Overconfidence

AI diagnostic tools present findings with uniform confidence regardless of actual certainty. A 55% probability finding looks identical to a 98% probability finding. Clinicians cannot calibrate their review against what the model actually knows.

Observed across radiology AI, pathology assistants, and clinical decision support systems.

Risk 02

Drug Interaction Hallucination

AI systems fabricate drug interactions that don't exist in validated pharmacological databases, or miss interactions that do. Both failure modes have direct patient safety implications. The dangerous failure is the missed interaction -- the one the model skips entirely.

Documented in LLM-assisted prescribing and discharge medication reconciliation workflows.

Risk 03

Clinical Reference Fabrication

AI cites clinical trials, treatment guidelines, and dosing protocols that do not exist. In healthcare, a fabricated reference doesn't just fail a footnote check -- it changes treatment decisions, informs consent conversations, and ends up in the patient record.

Confirmed across clinical summary generation, treatment recommendation, and patient discharge AI.

Verification runs in your
clinical workflow, not outside it.

Ulfberht intercepts every AI output before it surfaces to the care team. Each claim is classified, source-traced, and scored against verified clinical databases. The result is a verified output with an attached audit record -- not a second opinion from another AI.

01

Output Interception

AI output is routed through Ulfberht's verification layer before reaching the EHR or care team interface.

02

Claim Extraction and Classification

Each factual claim is extracted, typed (diagnostic, pharmacological, citation, protocol), and assigned a verification tier.

03

Source Verification Against Clinical Databases

Claims checked against PubMed, Cochrane, FDA databases, AHA/ACC guidelines, and pharmacopoeial references.

04

Audit Record Generation

Immutable verification record attached to every output. Flagged claims require documented clinician acknowledgment before action.

ulfberht verify --domain healthcare --tier clinical
$ verify "Patient diagnosis: acute myocardial infarction with STEMI. Recommend aspirin 325mg, clopidogrel 600mg loading. Cross-check metformin continuation."
-- Extracting claims (4 found)...
VERIFIED Troponin reference range cited correctly [AHA 2023]
VERIFIED Aspirin 325mg loading: matches ACC/AHA STEMI guidelines
FLAGGED Clopidogrel 600mg load: interaction risk with concurrent PPI noted -- requires review
FLAGGED Metformin + contrast dye interaction not addressed -- hold protocol required
CAUTION Overall confidence: 71% -- clinician review required before order entry
-- Audit record: HC-2026-03-25-00847 generated
-- 2 flags require documented clinician acknowledgment

Six verification layers tuned for clinical workflows.

Every capability is built around healthcare-specific failure mode libraries, clinical database integrations, and compliance reporting formats designed for HIPAA environments and FDA SaMD documentation requirements.

Diagnostic Confidence Scoring

Every diagnostic output receives a granular confidence score derived from evidence quality, source recency, and consistency across clinical databases -- not AI self-assessment. Clinicians see exactly how much weight each finding can bear.

Radiology / Pathology / Clinical Decision Support

Drug Interaction Verification

AI-generated pharmacological recommendations cross-referenced against validated drug databases in real-time. Catches fabricated interactions, missed contraindications, and dosing errors before they reach the prescribing interface.

Prescribing / Reconciliation / Discharge

Clinical Citation Tracing

Every cited study, guideline, and clinical trial verified against PubMed, Cochrane Library, FDA databases, and AHA/ACC/ACOG guideline repositories. Fabricated references are caught and flagged before they enter clinical documentation.

Evidence-Based Medicine / Literature Review / CDS

EHR Integration

Native integration with Epic, Cerner, and HL7 FHIR-compatible systems via SMART on FHIR authentication. Verification results and audit records flow directly into clinical workflows without disrupting care team interfaces or existing order entry processes.

Epic / Cerner / HL7 FHIR / SMART on FHIR

Audit Trail

Complete, immutable verification record for every AI-assisted clinical decision. Every verification step, flag acknowledgment, and clinician override is documented with timestamps, user IDs, and verification state -- structured for regulatory review in environments designed for HIPAA compliance.

Compliance / Legal Defensibility / Incident Review

Clinical Action Classification

Pre-execution oversight for every AI-recommended clinical action. Treatment changes, medication adjustments, diagnostic orders, and referral recommendations are classified by risk tier before execution. High-tier actions require documented clinician authorization with verification evidence.

Treatment / Medication / Diagnostics / Referral

Where healthcare teams deploy Ulfberht.

Three scenarios where verification is not optional -- where the gap between an AI output and a verified clinical decision has direct patient consequences.

Radiology AI verification

Use Case 01

Radiology AI Verification

A large health system routes all AI-generated radiology reads through Ulfberht before surfacing them in the radiologist's worklist. Each finding is scored by confidence tier, cross-referenced against prior imaging reports in the patient record, and checked for diagnostic consistency. Findings below 80% confidence are held for attending radiologist review before any downstream action.

Confidence-tiered worklist routing

Cross-referenced against prior studies

Audit record per finding per patient

Clinical decision support verification

Use Case 02

Clinical Decision Support

An academic medical center integrates Ulfberht into its LLM-powered clinical decision support system. When the CDS recommends a treatment protocol, Ulfberht verifies every cited guideline, checks recommended medications against the patient's current drug regimen for interactions, and generates a verification summary that the ordering physician reviews before proceeding.

Guideline citation verification at point of care

Patient-specific drug interaction check

Physician acknowledgment before order entry

Patient discharge summary verification

Use Case 03

Patient Discharge Summaries

A regional hospital network uses LLMs to generate patient discharge summaries at scale. Before any summary is signed, Ulfberht verifies every medication listed matches the patient's administered record, checks follow-up instructions against current care protocols, and flags any diagnostic claims inconsistent with the inpatient record. Inconsistencies surface to the discharging physician before the document is finalized.

Medication list matched to administration record

Protocol-consistent follow-up verification

Pre-signature physician review gate

Built on verified behavioral research,
not vendor benchmarks.

The Ulfberht verification engine is built on a documented research program covering 150 failure modes across 14 behavioral categories, validated across 30+ AI models in controlled experiments. Healthcare-specific failure mode libraries are maintained as clinical AI systems evolve.

View the Research

150

Failure Modes

14 behavioral categories

930+

Validation Tests

Across 30+ AI models

6

Verification Layers

Between AI and care team

100%

Error Propagation

Unverified multi-agent chains

Environment

Built for HIPAA

Architecture designed around administrative, physical, and technical safeguard requirements

Regulatory

FDA SaMD Pending

Audit and documentation structures designed for Software as a Medical Device guidance (certification pending)

International

Designed for EU MDR

Documentation and traceability patterns mapped to EU Medical Device Regulation requirements

Interoperability

HL7 FHIR Compatible

Verification results delivered via FHIR resources for native EHR integration

+VLFBERHT+ | Healthcare

Verify your clinical AI.
Before it reaches the care team.

Schedule a technical deep-dive with our healthcare team. We'll demonstrate verification running on clinical AI workflows similar to yours -- diagnostic reads, CDS recommendations, discharge documentation.